Review psychosocial control effectiveness by combining worker consultation with relevant before-and-after evidence, then checking whether the intended work change occurred, was sustained and created any new or different risks.
Safe Work Australia describes reviewing control measures as part of the risk-management process. A practical review connects the control to the work condition it was intended to change, then checks what happened after implementation.
SignalTrue compares aggregated team-level work patterns before and after a control and can help check sustainability and possible migration. It does not make a legal effectiveness decision or replace consultation.
No. SignalTrue supplies work-pattern evidence that can support a control review. The organisation remains responsible for consultation, applicable legal duties, context and the final decision.
No. Digital work-pattern evidence can complement worker consultation, observation, records and other relevant evidence; it should not replace them.
It is the possibility that one visible condition improves while demand moves into another channel, time period or team. A useful review checks for that before declaring success.