A useful psychosocial control review connects the original hazard and organisational action to expected work changes, worker consultation, before-and-after evidence, unintended effects and a documented maintain, modify or replace decision.
State what the organisation changed and what observable part of work should change if that control is doing what was intended. Then measure the same relevant conditions before and after implementation.
A before-and-after pattern can strengthen or weaken a hypothesis, but it does not by itself prove causation. Worker consultation and operational context remain necessary before a management decision.
Australian guidance says controls should be reviewed regularly and when circumstances indicate a review is needed, including when they may not be effective, workplace change creates new risk, consultation indicates a problem or an HSR requests review in relevant circumstances.
Worker consultation, workplace observation, reports, complaints, records and relevant data can all contribute. The appropriate mix depends on the hazard, work and jurisdiction.
No. SignalTrue is designed to add continuous work-pattern evidence between formal assessments and during control review.